I have often heard the following about going to war in casino war:
'I'm often asked where the house edge lays in this game. Where the edge comes from is when there is a war you either win one unit or lose two. For example, if you originally bet $5 you have to double your bet, risking $10, to win only $5.'
I disagree entirely
In order to explain my analysis I need the following assumptions:
A) If the odds of winning increases for the player, then the player should always increase his/her bet.
B) if the player always wins ties, then the player has better odds then if the player never wins ties
C) If the player always wins ties, then the player has the advantage(this one is not needed but because its true my point is even more valid)
Analysis: WLOG let the following 5's represent 5 dollar chips..
NOTE: the actually numbers used is to simplify the explanation and does not actually matter..
you put down 5 5(ten dollars) on the table dealer risks 5 5 so 5 5 | 5 5
you claim that never surrendering is 5 5 5 5 | 5 5(20 you 10 dealer)..this is incorrect
Proof:
assume the player only has four 5 chips..and the bank only has 2(the bank never needs to touch more)
5 5 5 5 player 5 5 bank
so let a tie occur..
Case one: you always surrender(push bet once)
you put out 5 5 and take back 5 so now it is
5 5 5 player 5 5 5 bank
you then proceed to bet 5 5 5(last chips the player has left) you now have Q chance to win back 5 5 5 so risks are 5 5 5 | 5 5 5
NOTE: all chips are on the table for the player to win with Q chance(chance of winning where ties are a loss)
Case two: you always surrender and never push bet
you put out 5 5 and take back 5 so now it is
5 5 5 player 5 5 5 bank
you then proceed to bet 5 5 you now have Q chance to win back 5 5
you then proceed to bet 5 you now have Q chance to win back 5
NOTE: chance to leave with all the chips is now 1-(1-Q)^2
Case three: you dont surrender this time
you put out 5 5 and then put out 5 5 so now it is
5 5 5 5 of the players and 5 5 of the bank money before the original flip
you now have a P chance of winning
NOTE: all chips are on the table for the player to win with P chance(chance of winning where ties are a win)
Conclusions:
In both situations the player has all of their chips on the table at the conclusion and the bank has all of its chips on the table:
In case one the player has Q chance of leaving the casino with all the chips
In case two the player has P chance of leaving the casino with all the chips
by assumption B) the player has better odds of winning in case three then case one
by assumption A) the player therefore has better odds of winning in case three then case two
so the player has best odds of winning in case three(the dont surrender)
therefore you should NEVER surrender..
Error:
The reason the initial statement was incorrect is the moment you tie the bank has already won one of the 5 chips..so when you place out two more 5 chips you have put out three 5 5 5(one of original and two more) and the bank has MATCHED this..
because you now win ties(and win more if this happens) your odds have gone up so pushing your bet is not ignorant(assumption A) also because of assumption C you actually have over 50% chance to win your money
Analysis:
if you always play ties(the better play by above), your odds of winning are..
W=chance to win with no ties a bit less then 50%
E=chance to tie a small amount
J=chance to lose a bit less then 50%
J=W
NOTE: W+E(.5)=.5
then Probability that you win is..
P=W+E*(W+E*1.5)+0*J (you win 50% more if it ties twice)
P=W+E(W+1.5-3W)=W+E(1.5-2W)
W<.5 so 2W<1 so
P>W+E(.5)=.5
so odds are > 50 % chance to win
Why:
So why does the casino still play the game?
At least three big reasons..
players often dont want to do equal bets for the same reason that you originally said it was a bad idea. this gives the casino a bigger then 50% chance to win
players often come to the table to just send their last chips until they lose them(dont walk away)
Gamblers fallacy..players increase there bets as they win..this increases the odds of loses it all
As you can see if you play the same amount every time AND you ALWAYS go to war, you have >50% chance to win..but as a human who has seen a coin come up heads more then 10 times in a row. over 50% chance to win does not mean you will always make money

A complete wrong idea, no betting system works, cant stop laugh.

Well, those brain cells I'll never get back.

I miss Casino War. I played it once at O'sheas. I think it was O'sheas that long ago. I got beat really bad. I think the best is Griswold playing that game at the klondike. He lost 40 bux pretty fast!

I understand the game. It's basically high low on a deck of cards where the highest hand wins.
1.) Does anyone play this? And if so, what's the fascination with the game? I just don't get it. Not exactly deriving the same pleasure as say a game of craps. Each to his own and everything, but what drives you to play this?
2.) Is there a strategy to playing this like counting cards...?
3.) Do you ever see people with significant win streaks playing this?

The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one. The happiness of credulity is a cheap and dangerous quality.---George Bernard Shaw

Tolerance is the virtue of believing in nothing

Donald Trump is a fucking criminal

NO KILL I

Tolerance is the virtue of believing in nothing

I play Casino War. I use it to pass a llittle time. And the scary thing is I actually enjoy it. Saying that, I only get to play it when I go to Vegas, and even then I only play it once in 2 weeks.

I have a new game that is going to be field trialed in Las Vegas in February and it's a Blackjack variation with a 'War' twist.
I'm hoping that 'War' players will like the added action and that Blackjack players will like the fact that they cannot 'bust' in the game.
I'll post some details on the Inventors' Corner nearer the time.
I must admit that I find 'War' rather boring so I'm hoping that this new game, 'Neverbust Blackjack' will provide enough excitement to interest players.

Superstitions are silly, childish, irrational rituals, born out of fear of the unknown. But how much does it cost to knock on wood? 😁 Note that the same could be said for Religion. I.E. Religion is nothing more than organized superstition. 🤗

Yes I played it at The Venetian and Sands in Macau.
Its really simple, no strategy that I can see. The player and dealer both get one card, highest card wins, In the event of a tie, the player can either surrender and lose the bet, or 'Go to war'. In this case the player and the casino matches the original bet, and the player and dealer both get another card after the dealer has burned 3 cards. Then high card wins. If a tie again, the player wins the whole pot.
Usually the cards are from a 6 deck shoe (no jokers), so no point in card counting.
The chance of the player or dealer winning in the first deal is 46.3% but the house advantage is in the case of the tie.
The golden rule is in the event of a tie, never surrender.
There is the option of a side bet which pays 10:1, the bet being paid if the player and dealer tie. Players can play their own card as well as any other players card if they so desire.
I played the game to kill time waiting for a certain roulette table. Its fast paced, simple and is best when all places at the table are taken.
I had some good runs, from memory double my starting amount in 20 minutes. But its sheer luck in my view.